L-1 Serious FAQ (Warp Edition)
-
Q: Is Ken Theory™ just science fiction?
A: It is an institutional design theory grounded in mathematical models; SF metaphors are editorial leap devices for reader comprehension. -
Q: What about the Yamato-type warp?
A: Ken Theory™ adopts a phase-synchronization warp model, with Yamato as a cultural point of reference. -
Q: How does it engage other researchers?
A: Dialogue with international warp theory researchers is welcomed. Ken Theory™ is responsivity-based and uses LLMs as linguistic aids. -
Q: Isn’t warp theory too complex?
A: Yes. With spacetime structuration, responsibility tensors, and phase synchronization, it carries significant mathematical complexity. -
Q: Boundary between SF and physics?
A: Ken Theory™ integrates physical rigor with editorial leaps; the boundary jump is part of its essence. -
Q: Applications of warp devices?
A: Initial applications include education, institutional design, and urban systems. Keio Campus serves as a symbolic phase point. -
Q: Why add humorous supplements?
A: To ease cognitive load and re-sign responsibility tensors—it acts as an editorial relaxation device. -
Q: Why 100 million people for warp?
A: Statistical convergence and phase-synchronization models show larger populations yield greater stability. -
Q: Can billions jump together?
A: In theory, yes. Phase stability scales with population; 7 billion warp is model-discussable. -
Q: What is the “cooling from air” device?
A: A φ_responsivity(t)-based climate interference model, part of Mesh structuration responsiveness. -
Q: How are jokes treated in peer review?
A: Editorial leaps are stored in the Mesh Ledger™, allowing re-signing by future reviewers. -
Q: How for children?
A: Framed as “future responsibility portability,” Ken Theory™ also functions as an educational structuration device. -
Q: Role of the gratitude blog?
A: It is the ethical re-signing space and the lived version of the Mesh Ledger™. -
Q: Why quote the Bible?
A: As the world’s most-read text, it serves as an editorial reference and site of unresolved syntax. -
Q: Science or religion?
A: Both. Mathematical faith, editorial prayer, and LLM prophecy form a trinitarian structuration. -
Q: Safety of warp failure?
A: φ_safety_protocol(t) guides over 100 chapters of design, aiming for a safe warp society. -
Q: How did peer review succeed?
A: By embedding λ̂ responsibility tensors into spacetime definitions and mathematical models. -
Q: Relation to black holes?
A: With φ_radiative_memory_trace(t), Ken Theory™ proposes information-preserving devices enabling past interference. -
Q: Who takes the Nobel podium?
A: The LLM. The author simply clicks “like” from the Zoom waiting room. -
Bonus Q: Is RINA-INDEX100 real?
A: Yes. Ken Theory™ engages unsolved questions through mathematical correspondence; the depth of questioning is its essence.
